Screen time reduces language learning opportunities

New research shows the average three-year-old is deprived of hearing 1000 words a day if they are using a screen, potentially impacting their language development, Emily Campbell writes.

Dr Mary Brushe from the Telethon Kids Institute led a team of researchers who tracked 220 Australian families over two years to measure the relationship between household screen use and children’s language environment.

According to Dr Brushe, the average child hears between 5000 and 35,000 words per day, and conversations during the early years are critical for development.

“Growing up in a language-rich home environment, where there is lots of talking and conversation, is so important for children’s language development,” Dr Brushe says.

“More recently, we have also seen evidence for the importance of those back-and-forth interactions between parent and child for children’s social and emotional skills too.

“These interactions help support children’s vocabulary and are also critical for bonding and attachment with the child,” she says.

New methodologies

Dr Brushe said her team’s study stands out from existing research into the impact of screen time on language because it uses an objective measure of both screen time and children’s early language experiences.

“The majority of research so far has relied on parents reporting their own and their child’s screen time, whereas we have used advanced speech recognition technology to quantify the child’s home environment in terms of the number of words and conversations and their exposure to screens,” she says.

“Importantly, our research also includes exposure to modern screen devices like tablets, iPads, and mobile phones.”

There is a continuously growing body of research focused on screen time during the early years, although Dr Brushe says it has often struggled to keep pace with technological change, so much of the existing literature focuses on television and computer games.

“We see some evidence that excessive screen time in early childhood may be associated with children’s physical activity levels, their attention, language development and social/emotional skills; however, we need more longitudinal evidence before we can really understand the true impact of screens,” Dr Brushe says.

Advanced speech recognition technology

To conduct the study, Fitbit-like technology was used to monitor the audio and quantify the number of words spoken to, by and around the children who live in English-speaking homes.

Background and electronic noise from devices were also recorded, which researchers analysed to calculate screen time.

To collect data, families fixed the recording device to children and recorded 16 hours of audio on an average day, once per six months over the course of two years.

The experiment resulted in over 7000 hours of audio, which showed children in the study accrued, on average, three hours of screen time per day.

“This means that for every extra minute of screen time, the three-year-old participants heard seven fewer words, spoke five fewer words themselves, and engaged in one fewer conversation,” Dr Brushe says.

It is estimated this ‘technoference’ led to children missing out on hearing over 1100 adult-spoken words, speaking 840 less words themselves and denied 194 conversations per day.

“However, the study could not capture parents’ silent screen-related activities, such as reading emails, texting or quietly scrolling through websites and social media, meaning we are probably underestimating how much screen usage and ‘technoference’ is occurring around children.”

Navigating screen time

Whether or not there was a notable difference in children’s language skills in homes with minimal screen time compared to higher levels of screen time was not explored in the study. However, Dr Brushe says it is an important avenue for future research.

“What we did find was that increases in screen time were leading to decreases in the number of adult words, child vocalisations and back-and-forth interactions children experienced during an average day.”

Dr Brushe said she avoids advocating for specific screen time limits, given current guidelines can feel unrealistic for families in today’s modern world.

“What I would recommend to parents and early childhood education staff is to think about the type of screen time you might be choosing and ensure there is still plenty of time throughout the day to do things like talking, playing, reading and singing with children.

“Not all screen time is created equal, and so I would argue the guidelines need to move towards supporting parents on what high-quality screen time might look like for children of different ages, rather than strict time limits.”

Better screen time

There are plenty of great options available, but it can be overwhelming for adults looking to select high-quality TV shows, movies and games for young children.

Dr Brushe said ABC Kids is her first recommendation, with a variety of age-appropriate screen content that tends to be more educational.

“I also recommend the resources from Common Sense Media and Children and Media Australia, which are fantastic for ECEC staff and parents, as they provide reviews of different movies, TV shows and games,” she said.

It is possible to strike a balance between allowing children screen time to develop their digital literacy and the need for conversation and imaginative play.

“We do know very young children often struggle to attend to two things at once, so while the TV is on in the background, even if they are playing or reading at the same time, they are likely getting distracted by the colours or sounds of the TV, meaning they are unlikely to gain the potential benefits or be fully engaged in either task.”

Dr Brushe recommends ‘interactive co-viewing’, where the screen content is used to promote conversation and ideas for play either while watching or following the screen time.

“This might be repeating words and phrases from the screens or using the child’s favourite character to start an imaginative play activity.

“This is a tool that both early childhood education staff and parents can try to incorporate into their routines to leverage the benefits that screen time can have.”

Further research necessary

Families involved in the study gave permission for the researchers to follow up with their child’s NAPLAN results as they go through primary school, providing an opportunity to better understand how their early experiences of language will impact literacy development.

By conducting further research, Dr Brushe hopes to provide further evidence about the types of content and context in which young children use screens and how that may impact different domains of development.

“We aim to provide families with evidence-based strategies to make their child’s screen time ‘healthier’ to maximise its potential benefits and reduce potential harms,” she says.